In the wake of the election of Donald Trump, I’ve had this feeling of dread. Witnessing the reactions of those who will be most at risk of harm from this administration’s policies, I know I’m not alone.
I recognize this dread, having previously experienced it most keenly during eras in which American political discourse vilified LGBTQ people—during the Reagan administration’s callous indifference to AIDS, and again in the push for “marriage protection amendments” under Bush II. In both cases, queers were a “threat” against which America had to be protected. A recurring thought in my middle-aged mind: Do we really have to enact this script again?
America’s political imagination often follows the conventions of melodrama, with a hero, a villain, and a damsel in distress that must be saved. In previous eras, Republican politicians and religious fundamentalists cast themselves as the heroic Dudley Do-Right, with LGBTQ people as the sinister Snidely Whiplash, and the heterosexual family and the nation itself as Nell tied to the train tracks.
I recognize this dread, having previously experienced it most keenly during eras in which American political discourse vilified LGBTQ people—during the Reagan administration’s callous indifference to AIDS, and again in the push for “marriage protection amendments” under Bush II. In both cases, queers were a “threat” against which America had to be protected. A recurring thought in my middle-aged mind: Do we really have to enact this script again?
America’s political imagination often follows the conventions of melodrama, with a hero, a villain, and a damsel in distress that must be saved. In previous eras, Republican politicians and religious fundamentalists cast themselves as the heroic Dudley Do-Right, with LGBTQ people as the sinister Snidely Whiplash, and the heterosexual family and the nation itself as Nell tied to the train tracks.
For a while, it might have seemed as though this particular melodramatic narrative was no longer politically viable. Trump’s acceptance speech for his nomination at the Republican National Convention was telling. He switched the positions within the melodramatic triangle, still casting himself as the hero, but putting queer people in the role of damsel in distress who needed to be saved from a “hateful foreign ideology”—i.e., villainous Islam.
One couldn’t ask for a better illustration of Jasbir Puar’s argument regarding homonationalism, which describes bringing certain queer citizens into the (white patriarchal) nationalist circle in order to demonize Muslims and immigrants as the hated “other.” This ideological shift attracted a certain number of xenophobic Gays for Trump, but the Republican candidate ultimately won only 14% of the LGBT vote—less than the 22% won by Romney in 2012.
Trump's evocation of a "hateful foreign ideology" was an attempt to obscure his support for hateful domestic ideologies. The president-elect is currently assembling a cabinet uniformly opposed to LGBTQ equality and threatening to roll back anti-discrimination advances made at the federal level. More immediately disturbing is the demonstrable increase of hate crimes, which have primarily targeted immigrants, African Americans, Jews, and queers.
Trump's evocation of a "hateful foreign ideology" was an attempt to obscure his support for hateful domestic ideologies. The president-elect is currently assembling a cabinet uniformly opposed to LGBTQ equality and threatening to roll back anti-discrimination advances made at the federal level. More immediately disturbing is the demonstrable increase of hate crimes, which have primarily targeted immigrants, African Americans, Jews, and queers.
Even if Trump avoided the rhetoric of queer vilification, his election has emboldened those who employ it regularly. Recently, one right wing pundit called for the destruction of the Stonewall Inn, the symbolic site of the start of the modern gay liberation movement. The pundit argued that granting national landmark status to the Stonewall (as Obama had done in June) was “elevating evil.”
“Evil.” Make no mistake: we’re still being cast as Snidely Whiplash. Maybe we’ll occasionally get to go on for Nell, probably at a matinee performance, when the theatre owners are hoping to attract a different audience. But in the minds of the newly empowered homophobes, we’re still wearing a black hat and twirling our moustache.
After the publication of Murder Most Queer in 2014, one colleague asked whether plays with homicidal homosexuals still had as much significance after the decriminalization of homosexuality and the victory same-sex marriage. Wasn’t homophobia over? Haven’t we won?
Well, there may be much that we’ve won. But as someone who has been tracking and analyzing homophobic ideology for over two decades, I’m aware that it’s never stopped being a powerful force across the country. Donald Trump did not create the horrible combination of anti-queer, anti-immigrant, anti-black, anti-Semitic, and anti-woman ideologies. He simply harnessed the forces that have been there all along.
Post-election, I see many of us shifting our energies from electoral politics to movement politics. Obviously the two are related, but I believe movement politics gives us a better opportunity to break out of the melodramatic narrative. We’re not the villain. We’re not the damsel in distress. And heroism is achieved not with the triumph of an individual, but with the collective betterment of us all. The script they’re handing us is not new. Indeed, we know these clichés quite well. And we must continue the struggle to rewrite it.
“Evil.” Make no mistake: we’re still being cast as Snidely Whiplash. Maybe we’ll occasionally get to go on for Nell, probably at a matinee performance, when the theatre owners are hoping to attract a different audience. But in the minds of the newly empowered homophobes, we’re still wearing a black hat and twirling our moustache.
After the publication of Murder Most Queer in 2014, one colleague asked whether plays with homicidal homosexuals still had as much significance after the decriminalization of homosexuality and the victory same-sex marriage. Wasn’t homophobia over? Haven’t we won?
Well, there may be much that we’ve won. But as someone who has been tracking and analyzing homophobic ideology for over two decades, I’m aware that it’s never stopped being a powerful force across the country. Donald Trump did not create the horrible combination of anti-queer, anti-immigrant, anti-black, anti-Semitic, and anti-woman ideologies. He simply harnessed the forces that have been there all along.
Post-election, I see many of us shifting our energies from electoral politics to movement politics. Obviously the two are related, but I believe movement politics gives us a better opportunity to break out of the melodramatic narrative. We’re not the villain. We’re not the damsel in distress. And heroism is achieved not with the triumph of an individual, but with the collective betterment of us all. The script they’re handing us is not new. Indeed, we know these clichés quite well. And we must continue the struggle to rewrite it.
RSS Feed